Women's Rights Hurts Men's Feelz

in which the managing editor of the Picton Gazette calls women's constitutional rights "hurtful and transphobic"

So, Jason Parks has decided that Canadian women aren’t allowed to have constitutional rights because this hurts men’s feewingsz. Yes, you read that correctly, women’s sex-based rights are “hurtful and transphobic”, how dare female people assert their humanity by establishing their physical and sexual boundaries and by demanding safeguards?! I mean, do we actually think we’re persons or something?

Wait, I thought we actually were–

Shut up terven wench! Where’s that Scold’s Bridle when ya needs it?

Yeah, wokebros apparently have decided the 1929 ruling by the British Privy Council which declared female people persons under the law no longer applies. SOGI Canadia no longer recognizes the rights of female people. In fact, that word female, that evil evil word, is verboten and any women uttering that word receives the punishment du jour for disobedient unwomen. Yeah, true female people have now become unwomen, and male humans who feelz like a woman are actual women, that’s Justin Trudeau’s new rape infested feminism! Complete with violations of The Geneva Convention and everything!

In his editorial, Jason Parks called out the insidious and transphobic advertising which was simply this ad created by CAWSBAR calling for recognition that gender self ID laws infringe upon women’s constitutionally guaranteed sex based rights, namely—

1. same sex washrooms, change rooms, hospital rooms

2. same sex rape and domestic violence shelters

3. same sex sporting competitions

4. sex-based programs, resources, awards

5. same sex prisons and law enforcement

6. crime statistics based on sex

7. same sex attracted women and their spaces.

I can’t write it enough times—the Managing Editor of The Picton Gazette seems to find the Canadian Charter rights of female people insidious and hurtful, as well as a human rights violation—for that’s what transphobia represents now, a human rights violation. So, Mr. Parks, my very existence as a Muslim female human in Canada is insidious, because the rights I’m entitled to and require/demand are hurtful to the feewingsz of the menz, huh? What, exactly do you wokebros expect female people like me to do with that?

It sounds like wokebros in Canada would really rather that female humans stopped altogether existing. That would make the charade complete, then, wouldn’t it?

A woman is an adult human female and Mr. Parks, you can cry harder about that. Humans are not sequential hermaphrodites, Mr. Parks, cry harder about that too. In fact your extremist position harms transsexual people, and in no way are trans people served by perpetuating the lie that women must give up their human rights in order for trans people to be fully included and safe in society. That’s a sh1t sandwich women are never eating, Mr. Parks. Women said no. Female people don’t exist to validate the identities of menz or their delicate feelz. Woman isn’t a costume, feeling, mood, fetish. Female isn’t the other F word.

JK Rowling espouses no divisiveness, Mr. Parks, by reminding you that female people are humans and not woke collateral you can redefine at whim. Sex is immutable. Straight males who feelz like a woman and identify as women are not lesbians, they are not female people, they are not entitled to female or lesbian attraction, spaces or services. Adults aren’t entitled to children’s services and programs and that’s not hateful—men are similarly excluded from female people’s services and programs. You are quite deranged if you cannot see that sex segregation is a necessary material reality.

What trans people need is their specific needs to be met—eroding the rights of female people, gaslighting them with DARVO bullsh1t and woke lies, eroding their sexual boundaries and challenging the concept of consent does nothing to meet trans people’s needs—rather all this noise distracts from that endeavour. Trans rights are not gay rights. Trans rights are not women’s rights. Gay rights require sex-based rights to be honoured. Women’s rights require sex-based rights to be honoured. Trans rights are trans rights. There also is no transitioning if sex doesn’t exist!

The continued gaslight and lie that we all must give up our constitutional rights because that’s what including trans people requires—go ahead and keep that one, Mr. Parks. Better yet, perhaps devote your efforts to having conversations and finding solutions and building spaces and services for the trans people you so clearly feel so passionately about. Dismantling constitutional rights is NOT how you can best serve trans people. Perhaps you might even listen to some of them who are fighting against gender extremism and fight to preserve sex-based rights! Scott Newgent and Buck Angel would love to have conversations with you and explain to you how wrong you are, Mr. Parks!

Rapists are being housed in female prison in Canada now, to the grave detriment of female people. Children are being lied to and brainwashed in schools, in secret behind their parent’s backs, by educators who poison children’s minds against their parents, who only seek to safeguard them. Woke parents who are closet anti gay now seek to transition their children if they think they might be gay. You realise the Iranian regime forces gay and lesbian humans to undergo transitioning under pain of death, because same sex attraction is punishable by death there and transitioning is seen as gay/lesbian conversion therapy, right? You realise this is a stark reality in the genderists movement, right? This is the reality of gender identity in Canada, and soon you will begin to see when the secrecy and cover-ups no longer suffice to repress the ugly truth and burgeoning scandal which extremists are trying their best to hide, and the media trying its best to ignore and misrepresent.

So, Mr. Parks, I suggest you need to think about your values and the way you have insulted and dehumanised Canadian women by telling them their constitutional rights are insidious and hurtful and a human rights violation against trans people. A female person is killed every 2.5 days in Canada. But you think we are hurtful for demanding our Charter rights? Wow, mate. Just wow.

What if … pro female doesn’t mean anything but pro female? What if pro female doesn’t mean anti trans … and if you honestly think “trans” means female people should stop advocating for sex based rights, then that’s a kind of self own and you sound like the Ayatollah ranting about how feminism is a Zionist plot, or like Ibn Salman of KSA saying feminism is terrorism against the state.

Yes, Mr. Parks, telling female people their sex based (ie human) rights are insidious and hurtful makes you sound like a hardline unhinged Islamist cleric or a deranged Wahhabist! Yes, that’s because dehumanising female people for some religious belief that declares any man can become a woman by saying so is actually a radical/extremists cult, and not a human rights movement.