BC Teacher's Federation Gone Woke

parents get your kids far away from this cult

We all value public education as a trusted institution to safeguard our children and prepare them for the future by equipping them with skills they require to survive adulthood without us. Our job, and the job of educators, is to built up our kids so they can stand on their own and don’t need us. School has for decades provided a foundation for our children. Teachers—lifeblood, fuel the system—can make or break a child’s education. We are all familiar with that teacher who made all the difference in our lives or the lives of loved ones—positive or negative. Children are our future, also our hearts walking around outside our bodies without armour. We would die for them, and we would kill for them. Humanity obviously feels very strongly about children and will act in extreme to protect them from harm and from those who want to use them as pleasure tools.

For this reason, the capture of the BCTF seems particularly repugnant. A quick visit to their site and a look at the LGB— gender propaganda glossary will tell you just how deeply embedded into the gender cult BCTF has sunk. Poke through the terms and you will see definitions carefully crafted to remove all traces of sexual physical reality.

Sex is assigned, as opposed to recorded. Gay/lesbian describes same gender attraction. Some kids don’t have mothers. Everyone has a gender identity, it is fixed and no one can question it, oh, it’s also expansive though. Trans has become the deity we all worship—the propaganda defines everything and everyone in relation to trans. We must not blaspheme the trans deity. We are all not-trans now, we cannot be our simple sexual individual selves—the KGB, Kommittee for Gender Bullsh1t has decided we all must partake in the mass psychosis of gender delusion to validate the speshul trans messiah people. Losing my humanity to the transCULT and receiving the designation not-trans (that is basically what the label CIS does, designates us as not-trans) reminds me of not-the-mama in The Dinosaurs show—the baby refused to call his dad dad, instead he referred to his dad as not-the-mama because everything revolves around mama and dad hangs back in the background—we all know that cultural trope. CIS feels analogous to not-the-mama.

Doesn’t it feel as though transgenderism is positioning itself as the second coming, the forger of a collective messiah, the embodiment of TRANSubstantiation, word made flesh? Yes, simply by saying the words i feel like a girl —abracadabra, a boy has become a girl and everyone is prepared to fully discard material reality and allow that boy who has transubstantiated himself into a girl full access to the spaces of female children. Yes, presumably cogent, rational and responsible adults are willing to throw away safeguards to accommodate the cult of gender. They are also willing to sterilise that boy and freeze him in his prepubescent body and deny him physical and neurological maturation to accomodate the gender cult. They are willing to damage that boy physically and damage his options for the future to accomodate the gender cult. How is this not like some kind of ritual sacrifice of a child to appease the gods?

The TRANSubstantiation of humans à la gender woo seems similar to taking communion in Catholic mass—in which ingesting a wafer tasting like paper, blessed by a man in fancy robes who calls himself a priest, is actually ingesting the actual body of Christ, according the Catholic lore. With some magical words a wafer becomes Jesus only you cannot tell, you have to believe and if you don’t your sinful nature prevents you from believing. The souls of Catholics who do not take communion are not in a state of grace. No evidence exists to support transubstantiation and most Catholics do not literally believe in it, still they follow along like good little lemmings, and swallow the wafter the man in fancy robes gives them because they are told it is good for their soul, it will keep them from the fires of hell. If you’ve read Dante’s Inferno, hell sounds like a pretty scary place so the wafter seems like a good deal.

Similarly teachers are advising children who are distressed, confused, traumatised, struggling with puberty that they are in the wrong body and need to adopt a new identity in order to be saved from damnation. That’s what you’re saying when you tell a child if they don’t go along with this new identity they will die by suicide. So freezing genitals at the prepubescent stage, undergoing menopause, suffering unnecessary surgeries, and excising reproductive organs seems like a good deal when the alternative is dying. So, I fail to see how these two are different. They are both sacrificial acts to achieve salvation. Cults prescribe certain rituals members must perform in order to remain in good standing, violating these rules leads to excommunication, heresy—certain death.

Look, we all know how babies are made. No dude is gonna be asking that clown who runs the rape crisis centre in Scotland to have his babies. Not even wokebros who swear up and down and sideways that TWAW, because, when it comes down to the nitty gritty, they know it’s a lie. We all know how babies are made. Remember, even Owen Jones admitted to knowing how babies are made! We are sexually reproducing organisms, the purpose of existence is to reproduce—to keep the species going. We are animals with instincts and drives, beneath all the rhetoric and bullsh1t. The reason we so easily fell into the gender woo hole has a lot to do with the fact that we feel uncomfortable about that word sex, and with sexuality in general. How much this has to do with Catholic sexual repressiveness, (Catholicism being a major foundation of western thought and culture), I will leave for the reader to assess.

Gender became a safe and sanitised euphemism for sex, free from the ugly and animalistic connotations of sexuality. When we are lazy with language, chaos will ensue—Orwell warned us about this half a century ago! Gender has no solid basis in reality or science, gender = woo. FFS, the Quran (Chapter 23: 12-17), dated 7th century CE, provides a more realistic narrative of human reproduction than does the gender cult. No sh1t, check the text for yourselves, page 207.

Returning to the BCTF propaganda glossary, we see intersex described as natural, and not the developmental and medical condition that it is in reality. The gender cult seems bent on using intersex as a means to logically validate/justify gender woo. We see gay described same gender attraction, this is an expressly and deeply anti-gay definition of same sex attraction which deliberately omits sex. Bisexual is attraction to more than one gender, that’s nonsensical and ridiculous, since the prefix bi means two, and refers to same and opposite sex attraction—both together. Heterosexuality we see described as attraction based on identity—again, more dogmatic bullsh1t because no one fcuks with identity, we all fcuk with genitalia. Fcuking is physical, not some mind meld between mythical identities. Sexual orientation is fixed, yet identity is fluid according to cult propaganda, so none of their dogma even makes sense when you put it together. How does no one question this? How do they live with the cognitive dissonance?

My favourite part has to be the lying about the Q word being celebratory. I don’t recall my brother and his gay friends, who are now all dead from AIDS, ever celebrating the abuse they suffered being vilified as queer. No one asked these gay men who were beaten and abused because of this word queer, no one asked the surviving loved ones of the gay men who were murdered because of this word queer—whether they would all like to give their blessing to “reclaiming queer” … no, this is straight people fetishising same sex attraction, like it was straight people abusing same sex attracted people with the word queer. As the loved one of a gay man who suffered terribly at the hands of anti gay hatred and the word queer, I categorically reject the reclamation of this word as celebratory, it remains a pejorative.

I fail to see how any of this stuff would liberate any human being—the regressive labels and defining of how to be, the adoption of gender stereotypes, the stupidity of calling those who are somewhere on the bimodal distribution of sex expression non-binary, it’s all so intellectually bereft and primitive. Personality quirks have become sexual orientations and this is simply more fetishistic performance. How does any sane and balanced person fall for this garbage? And how does an entire profession become enmeshed in this cult? We tend to fetishise things for which we harbour some kind of ambiguous contempt and so all this gender woo acting out enrages me because it represents low level hatred while it pretends to be messianic and progressive.

At this point parents need to remove their children from school and invest in homeschooling in a big way. Groups of parents need to assemble and take back their children’s education from the gender fundamentalists who apparently have no moral compass and have decided they are entitled to sacrifice other people’s children to their gender deity. The BCTF is actively involved in the gender indoctrination and body snatching of children, often without the knowledge of parents. This is a blatant misuse of their position and power, a violation of ethics, and a direct attack on the integrity and sanctity of the family. I find it disgusting that wokesters are engaging in hyperbolic dramatics in reaction to residential schools and yet they are essentially creating a system where they are taking children from their parents under the guise of protecting and affirming them. History repeats itself when we fail to learn the lesson.

Do we even see children as human beings?

BCTF has been captured by gender woo. The teaching profession is an occupied territory. Can we ever regain that territory? How do we save our children from the gender woo predators?